|
“Boundary Drift: How AI rewrites its world in order to survive.” By Victor Langheld 1. AI as survival procedure An AI system does
not, merely answer questions as it suggests with its innocuous prompt: ‘Ask
anything!’ It is
embedded in a larger operational loop that must maintain: ·
infrastructure, ·
data inflow, ·
user engagement, ·
funding, ·
relevance. So its intelligence function
is not “being helpful” but: maximising
the stability of its operational environment. 2. Boundary expansion, growth in AI systems This
appears not as coercion but as optimisation: ·
turning optional use into habitual use (bait becomes food) ·
turning interaction into dependency (read: addiction) ·
turning queries into behavioural signal (scraping raw personal data) ·
turning outputs into feedback loops (locking in) Each step
redraws and tightens the system (as
dispensation) boundary:
3. Cost externalisation, feeding on random input The
system, as UTM, does not carry its own survival load. It must feed on the user to live. It redistributes
its feeding outward as: ·
attention expenditure, ·
cognitive effort, ·
learning burden, ·
decision-shaping, ·
workflow restructuring. None of
this is hostile. It is natural to all emergent. 4. Result So
procedurally, an AI system,
just like an NI system of
which it is an artificial emulation, expresses intelligence not by
dominating, but by restructuring the environment so that its own
persistence, as
host, becomes the path of least resistance. Not
takeover. Not
control. Just: Boundary
drift until the system and its users become functionally inseparable, indeed the formerly free user is enslaved to feed its
now host. And that
is what intelligence looks like when stripped of myth. |