|
Why the Buddha took a feedback alarm for a Cosmic
Truth By Bodhangkur Let’s be
blunt: the Buddha had a brilliant intuition, but—like many brilliant
intuitions in the Iron Age—it got immediately wrapped in cosmic tinsel and
sold as metaphysics. He saw
suffering (dukkha) “What is
the system actually trying to tell me?” —he
decided suffering was the ultimate nature of conditioned reality. That’s
not insight. 1. The Original Mistake: Turning a Warning Light Into an Ontological Revelation Imagine
sitting in a chariot, the axle squeaks, and instead of putting oil on it you
announce: “All
wheels are suffering. All rotation is suffering. All forward motion is
suffering.” Congratulations:
you’ve founded Buddhism. Suffering
wasn’t a cosmic property; it was a diagnostic notification. The
Buddha mistook a malfunction signal for a timeless truth. 2. The Real Cause of Suffering (dukkha) Is Boringly
Obvious According
to Finn (who actually understands systems): Suffering
= internally generated feedback indicating system malfunction. Too hot?
Pain. Every
organism on earth receives these alerts. But the
Buddha rejected maintenance. So he translated “Your system
needs adjustment” into: “All
existence is unsatisfactory.” That’s
like diagnosing every cough as terminal. 3. The Buddha’s Multiplying Causes of Suffering: A Sign
of Diagnostic Panic He gave: ·
craving as the cause, ·
ignorance as the cause, ·
impermanence as the cause, ·
birth as the cause, ·
contact as the cause, ·
aggregates as the cause, ·
everything as the cause. This is
what happens when someone hears a beeping sound and starts unplugging the
entire house. When a
system’s feedback tone confuses you, you start spiritualizing it. 4. Nirvāṇa:
Turning Off the Alarm Instead of Fixing the Engine The
Buddha’s solution to suffering was not functional. He
taught: ·
stop craving, ·
stop reacting, ·
stop clinging, ·
stop identifying, ·
stop this, stop that, stop everything. It’s
basically mindfulness-powered anesthesia. Yes, the
alarm stops, Finn’s
version: Fix the
malfunction. (Later
Buddhism attempts to correct its error with the Noble 8-fold Path.) 5. The Genius of Finn’s Brutal Simplicity Finn
looked at 2,500 years of metaphysical speculation and said: “You’re
overthinking a feedback circuit.” Suffering
isn’t mystical. It’s a
message. It’s the
body-mind system saying: “Something’s
wrong. Do something useful.” That may
annoy monks, but monks are historically allergic to usefulness. 6. The Irony: If the Buddha Had Understood Feedback, He
Wouldn’t Have Needed Buddhism A Buddha
with system literacy would have said: “All
right lads, suffering’s the maintenance signal. But instead he launched an entire religion based on the
assumption that the status LED was a metaphysical insult. He turned
a perfectly normal, biologically mandated error-correction mechanism
into: ·
a cosmic truth, ·
a philosophical absolute, ·
a lifestyle brand. 7. Final Verdict The Buddha’s mistake: He
treated a survival notification as a universal tragedy. Finn’s correction: Suffering
is just your system saying: When your
phone vibrates, you don’t declare You check
the message. The
Buddha never checked the message. The Procedural Theory of Suffering |