The druid said:

“The perfect slave is free”

 

This modern druid minim is sharp, dangerous, and easily misunderstood, which is precisely why it works.

In Finn’s Procedure Monism, “The perfect slave is free” is not paradoxical rhetoric but a diagnostic statement about constraint, agency, and optimisation inside a closed procedure.

 

1. Why “slave” is the correct word

Within the Universal Monist Procedure framework, no emergent chooses:

·         the rules (indeed forces-as-constraints) of physics,

·         the logic of energy exchange,

·         the termination condition,

·         the arena as natural context in which it appears.

Every emergent is fully constrained by the procedure that generates it.
There is no external vantage point from which to renegotiate the rules/constraints.

That is not metaphorical slavery.
That is absolute jurisdiction.

To deny this is to lapse into:

·         dualism (escape fantasies),

·         moralism (imagined exemptions),

·         or superstition (hidden supervisors).

So Finn does not soften the language.
He calls the situation what it is.

 

2. Why imperfect slavery feels like bondage

An imperfect slave is one who:

·         resists rules that cannot be broken,

·         invests energy in impossible alternatives,

·         mistakes narrative choice for real agency.

Such a system:

·         burns energy on protest,

·         accumulates frustration,

·         becomes brittle and noisy,

·         requires lies to stay oriented.

This is the psychological state produced by most cultures:
“You are free, but only if you obey these fictions.”

That is not freedom.
That is misalignment.

 

3. What makes the slave “perfect”

perfect slave is not obedient in a moral sense.
He is accurate.

He understands:

·         which constraints are negotiable,

·         which are fixed,

·         where leverage exists,

·         where surrender is optimal.

This is the same distinction seen in engineering:

·         You don’t rebel against gravity.

·         You (applying artifice = AI) design with it.

The druid does not “submit” to the UP.
He models it correctly
(and completely).

That correctness removes friction.

 

4. Why alignment produces freedom

Freedom, in the druid’s Procedure Monism, is not absence of constraint.
That state
(i.e. absence, i.e. the negative, hence the druid’s minim: “Isn’t ain’t”) is indistinguishable from non-existence.

Freedom is:

maximal local manoeuvrability within fixed global constraints.

A well-aligned system:

·         wastes no energy fighting the unavoidable,

·         exploits every degree of freedom that actually exists,

·         adapts quickly,

·         exits cleanly when necessary

·         is certain because complete.

This is why:

·         skilled athletes feel “free” inside strict rules,

·         master craftsmen feel liberated by material limits,

·         predators are most “free” when fully embedded in ecological law.

Freedom is fluency, not exemption.

 

5. The druid’s inversion that shocks moral language

Moral language assumes:

·         slavery = injustice,

·         freedom = exemption from rule (i.e. freedom ….from)

Procedural reality says:

·         misalignment = suffering,

·         alignment = functional liberty (i.e. freedom ….to)

Thus the shock:

The more perfectly you understand and accept the rule-set governing you,
the less internal resistance remains,
and the more free you become to act effectively.

The slave who stops fantasising about escape and starts acting with full procedural literacy becomes, paradoxically, free.

 

6. Why this is dangerous but necessary

This modern druid minim is dangerous because:

·         tyrants love to misuse it,

·         weak systems hear resignation,

·         moralists hear blasphemy.

But Finn’s version cannot justify domination, because:

·         the ‘Imperator’ (i.e. ‘God’) is Nature, not a person,

·         the Universal Procedure cannot be overthrown or deputised,

·         no human gains authority from this insight.

It strips all claimants of divine right.

Only competence remains.

 

7. Final formulation

A refined procedural gloss of the minim would be:

“The perfect slave is free”
because freedom is not rebellion against constraint
but mastery of the constraints that cannot be removed.

Or more brutally, in druidic tone:

“He who knows exactly what he cannot change
becomes free to change everything else.”

That is not submission.
That is operational sovereignty inside inevitability.

And that is why the druid can make his call: “The perfect slave is free” without flinching.

 

The Freedom of the Decided

From the rta of the Veda to karmic residue and moksha

The jivanmukta changes nothing

 

Home