|
The druid said: “The perfect slave is free” This modern druid minim
is sharp, dangerous, and easily misunderstood, which is precisely why it
works. In Finn’s Procedure Monism, “The perfect slave is free” is not paradoxical rhetoric
but a diagnostic statement about constraint, agency, and optimisation
inside a closed procedure. 1. Why “slave” is the
correct word Within the Universal Monist Procedure framework, no emergent
chooses: ·
the rules (indeed
forces-as-constraints) of physics, ·
the logic of energy exchange, ·
the termination condition, ·
the arena as natural context in which it appears. Every emergent is fully
constrained by the procedure that generates it. That is not metaphorical
slavery. To deny this is to lapse
into: ·
dualism (escape fantasies), ·
moralism (imagined exemptions), ·
or superstition (hidden supervisors). So Finn does not soften the
language. 2. Why imperfect slavery
feels like bondage An imperfect slave is
one who: ·
resists rules that cannot be broken, ·
invests energy in impossible alternatives, ·
mistakes narrative choice for real agency. Such a system: ·
burns energy on protest, ·
accumulates frustration, ·
becomes brittle and noisy, ·
requires lies to stay oriented. This is the psychological
state produced by most cultures: That is not freedom. 3. What makes the slave
“perfect” A perfect slave is
not obedient in a moral sense. He understands: ·
which constraints are negotiable, ·
which are fixed, ·
where leverage exists, ·
where surrender is optimal. This is the same distinction
seen in engineering: ·
You don’t rebel against gravity. ·
You (applying artifice = AI) design with it. The druid does not “submit”
to the UP. That correctness removes
friction. 4. Why alignment produces
freedom Freedom, in the druid’s Procedure Monism, is not absence of
constraint. Freedom is: maximal local manoeuvrability within fixed global
constraints. A well-aligned system: ·
wastes no energy fighting the unavoidable, ·
exploits every degree of freedom that actually exists, ·
adapts quickly, ·
exits cleanly when necessary ·
is certain because complete. This is why: ·
skilled athletes feel “free” inside strict rules, ·
master craftsmen feel liberated by material limits, ·
predators are most “free” when fully embedded in
ecological law. Freedom is fluency,
not exemption. 5. The druid’s inversion that
shocks moral language Moral language assumes: ·
slavery = injustice, ·
freedom = exemption from rule (i.e. freedom ….from) Procedural reality says: ·
misalignment = suffering, ·
alignment = functional liberty (i.e. freedom ….to) Thus the shock: The more perfectly you understand and accept the rule-set governing you, The slave who stops
fantasising about escape and starts acting with full procedural literacy
becomes, paradoxically, free. 6. Why this is dangerous but
necessary This modern druid minim is
dangerous because: ·
tyrants love to misuse it, ·
weak systems hear resignation, ·
moralists hear blasphemy. But Finn’s version cannot
justify domination, because: ·
the ‘Imperator’ (i.e. ‘God’) is Nature, not a person, ·
the Universal Procedure cannot be overthrown or deputised, ·
no human gains authority from this insight. It strips all claimants
of divine right. Only competence remains. 7. Final formulation A refined procedural gloss
of the minim would be: “The perfect slave is free” Or more brutally, in druidic
tone: “He who
knows exactly what he cannot change That is not submission. And that is why the druid
can make his call: “The
perfect slave is free” without flinching. From the rta of the Veda to karmic
residue and moksha The jivanmukta
changes nothing |