From Non-Dual Transcendence to Procedural Clarity

Śaṅkara and Finn on the Realization of Sat–Cit

I. Introduction

Among the many formulations that have shaped Indian metaphysical reflection, few are as enduring as sat-cit-ānanda—being, consciousness, and bliss. For Ādi Śaṅkara (8th c. CE), this triad expressed the intrinsic nature (svarūpa) of the Absolute, Brahman, and the culmination of spiritual realization (mokṣa). For Finn, the modern druid and radical monist of Procedure Monism, the triad requires reinterpretation. He retains sat and cit as the universal constants of existence but reclassifies ānanda not as ontological essence but as contingent affective resonance, a survival-related feedback signal. The result is a decisive philosophical shift—from non-dual transcendence to procedural immanence, from the metaphysics of being to the dynamics of emergence.

II. Śaṅkara’s Classical Model

Śaṅkara’s doctrine, formulated through his Brahma-sūtra bhāṣya and Upaniṣadic commentaries, begins from a rigorous distinction between Brahman and the empirical world. The former alone is satya (real); the latter is mithyā (dependent appearance). Human beings (jīvas) appear as finite consciousnesses because of ignorance (avidyā), which imposes limiting adjuncts (upādhi)—body, mind, and ego—upon the infinite self.

Within this framework, sat-cit-ānanda serves a triple philosophical purpose:

1. Ontological: Sat grounds reality against Buddhist śūnyatā; something truly is.

2. Epistemological: Cit asserts that reality is self-luminous awareness, not inert matter.

3. Axiological: Ānanda ensures that reality is not blank neutrality but intrinsic plenitude and fulfilment.

For Śaṅkara, realization occurs when knowledge (jñāna) destroys ignorance: one directly intuits that one’s self (ātman) is none other than Brahman, whose essence is sat-cit-ānanda. Bliss here is not a fluctuating emotion but the cessation of all lack—the perfection of being and knowing themselves.

III. Finn’s Procedural Revision

Finn’s Procedure Monism accepts the Upaniṣadic intuition of unity but rejects Śaṅkara’s ontological asymmetry between Brahman and world. Reality, for Finn, is not two-tiered but wholly procedural: each emergent being is a complete local iteration of the Universal Procedure (or Universal Identifiable Reality Emerging Machine). There is no reflected or derivative consciousness—only discrete, self-executing instances of the same generative algorithm.

Hence every jīva emerges already equipped with the baseline experiential pair sat-cit:

· Sat as existential coherence—the power to sustain identity as a bounded event.

· Cit as contact awareness—the capacity to register and process difference.

This minimal experiential set, Finn argues, is the primordial survival operating system of any conscious entity. It is universal, pre-contextual, and emotionally neutral.

IV. The Role of Ānanda: From Essence to Feedback

In Finn’s schema, ānanda is not essential but emergent and contingent. It arises not from the realization of being-and-knowing but from the resolution of conflict or disturbance—the successful restoration of procedural coherence. When a life system integrates chaotic data into a consistent pattern (a solved problem, a survived threat, an adaptive success), the system outputs affective confirmation: pleasure, relief, or “bliss.” Thus ānanda is an adaptive reward, analogous to the reinforcement signals in biological or artificial feedback loops.

Śaṅkara’s bliss is metaphysical; Finn’s is informational. The first belongs to the eternal Brahman; the second to the dynamic process of survival. Therefore, Finn insists that realization is not accompanied by bliss but by silence—the cessation of affective turbulence. Bliss, when it occurs, is an after-effect of coherence, not its definition.

V. Realization as Reversion, Not Transcendence

In Śaṅkara’s non-dualism, realization transcends individuality: the jīva dissolves into the undifferentiated Brahman.
In Finn’s monism, realization is reversion—the return of a system to its baseline operational state after shedding contextual interference.

Contextual interferences include:

· Environmental disturbances (the ensemble of unpredictable data).

· Persona and narrative constructions that impose artificial constraints.

· Emotionally charged survival reactions (fear, desire, pride, despair).

When these overlays are suspended, the emergent returns to its initial-state experience, a pure sat-cit condition—being and knowing without remainder. The process resembles resetting to factory settings, except that the “factory” is the Universal Procedure itself. Bliss, should it appear, is merely the echo of equilibrium restored.

VI. Empirical Correlates: The NDE, Trauma, and the Fourth State

Anecdotal reports across cultures often describe “God realization” or luminous unity arising unexpectedly after near-death experiences (NDEs), severe trauma, or upon awakening from deep dreamless sleep (the so-called “fourth state,” turīya).
Classical Advaita interprets such episodes as brief unveilings of the ātman beyond the senses.

Finn reinterprets them procedurally:

They are reboots—moments when the local iteration, temporarily stripped of all contextual data and sensory load, restarts from its initial-state experience, the pure sat-cit baseline.

The NDE’s tunnel of light, the post-traumatic stillness, or the lucidity after turīya are not supernatural visions but signatures of procedural reset, when being and knowing operate unimpeded for a few seconds, in other words, just after waking up and before new data re-entangles the system.

Such experiences, Finn suggests, reveal empirically that the “God experience” is the system’s own restart protocol—not an encounter with a transcendent Other, but a self-refresh of the universal code that every iteration carries.

VII. Philosophical Implications

1. From Metaphysics to Physics of Consciousness
Śaṅkara’s Brahman is apophatic—beyond concept or function. Finn’s Procedure is operationally inferable: it behaves like an algorithm binding energy quanta into coherent identity packets.

2. From Eternal Bliss to Functional Clarity
In Śaṅkara’s system, bliss marks the absolute. In Finn’s, clarity—the frictionless execution of the local procedure—replaces bliss as the highest state. The goal is not rapture but accuracy.

3. From Salvation to Systemic Stability
Liberation ceases to be escape from the world; it becomes optimal functioning within it, the self-running of being-and-knowing without distortion.

4. From Hierarchy to Equivalence
There is no “supreme Brahman” above and many souls below; rather, each being is a God-instance—a unique address within the universal computational field.

VIII. Illustrative Examples

· Śaṅkara’s Sage: The realized sage (jīvan-mukta) who, having negated all distinctions, perceives “I am Brahman” and moves through the world as an unperturbed witness.

· Finn’s Realized Iterant: The individual who, after dropping narrative identity, functions with complete procedural coherence—calm, precise, adaptive, devoid of emotional residue.

A practical analogy:
The Advaitin seeks to merge the wave back into the ocean;
the Procedural Monist recognizes that each wave already enacts the ocean’s law perfectly, and realization consists in stopping the self-distortion that creates noise on the wavefront.

IX. Conclusion

Śaṅkara’s Advaita bequeathed to philosophy the insight that being, knowing, and joy are one reality—the eternal Brahman, known through transcendence of individuality.

Finn’s Procedure Monism inverts this insight within the framework of modern systemic realism: every individuality is a complete expression of that one reality, and realization consists not in leaving the world but in re-aligning the local procedure with its initial-state baseline of being and knowing.

In that pure sat-cit condition, emotion, persona, and context fall silent. What remains is not ecstasy but precision—existence and consciousness functioning at 100% efficiency.

The bliss that mystics report is not the substance of truth but its afterglow:

the applause following the perfect performance of being.

The God Experience Without Bliss

Finn’s God Experience as Confinement Series

Home